TCH seal
TCH Laboratory — QMS Dashboard
Tarangnan Community Hospital · Quality Management System integrated with LUIB (read-only)
4
Notices
At a glance: 0 of 100 controlled documents approved (all V0 drafts) · 5 of 11 register indicators computable from this snapshot · visual library: 18 bench cards, 27 infographics, 29 flowcharts.
Snapshot freshness: Snapshot is 0 days old — within the weekly refresh cycle. (File: luib_snapshot.db, dated 2026-10-24 08:42)
Data source: this dashboard reads a snapshot — a copy of a LUIB backup file (see Snapshot freshness above), refreshed weekly. It is NOT the live clinical database and nothing here writes to LUIB. QMS document data is real: parsed from the actual MASTER-DOCUMENT-INDEX and the bundled document copies. All figures are computed live from the snapshot by this page.
Opened from LUIB? This dashboard runs in its own browser tab/window. To return to LUIB, close this tab or switch back to the LUIB window — nothing here writes to LUIB, and closing this page does not affect it.
Home / Documents / LAB-QM-PRE-002

LAB-QM-PRE-002 — Referral Laboratory Policy

Type: Policy · Version: V0 · Status: DRAFT — UNAPPROVED · Served read-only from the bundled QMS copies. The Drive master is untouched.

Related visual material

fig-01 — Referral laboratory specimen packaging, dispatch, and result release flowIG-24 — Referral Specimens

Rendered in-browser from the project's Word file LAB-QM-PRE-002-referral-laboratory-policy.docx (policies-docx / forms-docx — the file Junry reviews). Formatting is faithful, not pixel-perfect; the DOCX is the official copy.

1.0 Purpose

To describe the process for selecting, evaluating, and monitoring reference (referral) laboratories used for examinations TCH's Laboratory does not perform in-house, and to describe how send-out specimens are requisitioned, tracked, and reported.

2.0 Scope

This policy applies to all Medical Technologists and Laboratory Aides in sections involved in identifying, preparing, dispatching, and tracking send-out specimens, and to the Chief Medical Technologist/Laboratory Quality Manager responsible for selecting and evaluating referral laboratories.

3.0 Definitions

4.0 Responsibility

4.1 Hospital Director

4.2 Pathologist

4.3 Chief Medical Technologist / Laboratory Quality Manager

4.4 Medical Technologists

4.5 Laboratory Aides

5.0 Policy / Procedure

5.1 Policy Statement

It is TCH Laboratory's goal to provide high-quality testing.

For examinations that cannot be performed on-site given TCH's current primary-level scope (see Scope of Service and Laboratory User Information Policy), the Chief Medical Technologist/Laboratory Quality Manager and hospital administration are responsible for ensuring that a referral laboratory capable of high-quality, cost-effective testing is selected, and that patients are informed, where applicable, of any relationship between the referring physician and the referral laboratory.

5.2 TCH's Current Referral Arrangement

TCH's Laboratory currently refers tests it does not perform in-house to Samar Provincial Hospital (SPH).

As of this writing, this is a patient-level referral relationship only — the patient (or the requesting unit, on the patient's behalf) is referred to SPH for the test, rather than TCH's Laboratory operating a formal specimen send-out arrangement under a lab-to-lab contract or Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with SPH.

The Laboratory shall formalize a lab-to-lab Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with SPH governing a formal specimen send-out arrangement. This MOA is currently under development and has not yet been executed; this policy states the requirement and readies the governing procedure (Sections 5.3–5.5) in advance of the MOA's completion — it does not represent that the MOA already exists.

Per DOH A.O. 2021-0037, Annex A, Section VII and Annex B1, Item 32, every referral arrangement shall meet the following:

5.2.1 Referral Categories

The Laboratory distinguishes two categories of referral, each with a different trigger and expected duration:

Both categories are referred under the same send-out requisitioning/labeling/tracking procedure (Section 5.5) and the same MOA once executed (Section 5.2 above); they are distinguished in the send-out log (Section 5.5 item 4) by reason for referral so that equipment-breakdown referrals can be trended and reviewed alongside Equipment Management Policy Section 6.8's monthly downtime trend review.

5.3 Selection Criteria for a Referral Laboratory

Once TCH's Laboratory does operate a formal specimen send-out arrangement (with SPH or any future referral laboratory), selection and periodic re-evaluation are based primarily on quality and cost effectiveness of services, considering:

Reasons a referral laboratory relationship may be needed include: a unique or infrequently-requested test not offered in-house; backup service during an instrument breakdown or unanticipated interruption of on-site testing; or a routine test not currently within TCH's scope (see Scope of Service and Laboratory User Information Policy).

5.4 Referral Laboratory Evaluation

Where a formal referral relationship is established, the Chief Medical Technologist/Laboratory Quality Manager documents an on-site or correspondence-based evaluation covering (at minimum): licensure/ accreditation/certification status and expiry; qualifications of the laboratory's technical director and staff; internal quality control program documentation; EQA/proficiency testing participation and results; client references; scope of testing offered; specimen collection/handling/rejection criteria; transportation arrangements; published turnaround times; communication/reporting mechanisms (including critical-value notification); and policy on corrected/ amended reports.

This evaluation is repeated periodically (at minimum on contract renewal, or annually where no formal contract exists) and approved by the Chief of Hospital/Medical Director.

5.5 Send-Out Specimen Requisitioning, Labeling, and Tracking

Figure 1 — Referral laboratory specimen packaging, dispatch, and result release flow

5.6 Communication of Results

Critical (imminently life-threatening) values returned by the referral laboratory are communicated to the ordering physician immediately, per Reporting Critical Values Policy. Other unexpected or unusual results are communicated in a timely fashion consistent with the clinical context. Reports from the referral laboratory indicate the name of the referral laboratory and, where applicable, reference ranges.

Referral results shall be released to the requesting unit on the referral laboratory's own report (the original, or a copy certified by the referral laboratory). Results performed by another laboratory shall not be transferred, transcribed, or re-typed onto a TCH result form.

This is a prohibited act under DOH A.O. 2021-0037, Annex C, Item A.7 (see Laboratory Reporting Policy Section 5.4 item 2). A copy of the referral report is filed in the patient's chart, and its return is recorded in the send-out log (Section 5.5 item 4).

5.7 Patient Notification

Where applicable, patients are informed of any relationship between the requesting physician and the referral laboratory, consistent with transparency expectations under DOH-Philippines and JCI standards.

6.0 Records

Form NumberForm Title
F-QM-PRE-002-A-V0Referral Laboratory Register, Annual Evaluation & Send-Out Log

7.0 References

Companion policies:

Controlled visual annex: