TCH seal
TCH Laboratory — QMS Dashboard
Tarangnan Community Hospital · Quality Management System integrated with LUIB (read-only)
4
Notices
At a glance: 0 of 100 controlled documents approved (all V0 drafts) · 5 of 11 register indicators computable from this snapshot · visual library: 18 bench cards, 27 infographics, 29 flowcharts.
Snapshot freshness: Snapshot is 0 days old — within the weekly refresh cycle. (File: luib_snapshot.db, dated 2026-10-24 08:42)
Data source: this dashboard reads a snapshot — a copy of a LUIB backup file (see Snapshot freshness above), refreshed weekly. It is NOT the live clinical database and nothing here writes to LUIB. QMS document data is real: parsed from the actual MASTER-DOCUMENT-INDEX and the bundled document copies. All figures are computed live from the snapshot by this page.
Opened from LUIB? This dashboard runs in its own browser tab/window. To return to LUIB, close this tab or switch back to the LUIB window — nothing here writes to LUIB, and closing this page does not affect it.
Home / Documents / F-QM-POST-001-A-V0

F-QM-POST-001-A-V0 — Official Laboratory Result Validation, Format Review & Amended/Corrected Report Form

Type: Form · Version: V0 · Status: DRAFT — UNAPPROVED · Served read-only from the bundled QMS copies. The Drive master is untouched.

Parent document: LAB-QM-POST-001 — Laboratory Reporting Policy (parent is encoded in the form number)

Rendered in-browser from the project's Word file F-QM-POST-001-A-V0-result-validation-checklist.docx (policies-docx / forms-docx — the file Junry reviews). Formatting is faithful, not pixel-perfect; the DOCX is the official copy.

Document #F-QM-POST-001-A-V0Parent DocumentLAB-QM-POST-001 — Laboratory Reporting Policy

---

Part 1 — Multi-Stage Result Validation Checklist

The testing Medical Technologist completes this checklist before printing, authorizing, or transmitting patient findings.

1.1 Pre-Analytical Verification

Verification ItemStatus (Pass / Fail)Remarks
1. Requisition matches specimen primary container (Full Name, HRN/MRN, Age, Sex)[ ] Pass [ ] Fail
2. Specimen collection date, time, and source recorded accurately[ ] Pass [ ] Fail
3. Specimen integrity acceptable (no gross hemolysis, lipemia, micro-clots, or insufficient volume)[ ] Pass [ ] Fail

1.2 Analytical Verification

Verification ItemStatus (Pass / Fail)Remarks
1. Daily internal QC (IQC) within acceptable limits (±2 SD) on testing run[ ] Pass [ ] Fail
2. Instrument calibration curve verified; zero hardware error flags on printout[ ] Pass [ ] Fail
3. Biological plausibility verified; result plausible against clinical diagnosis[ ] Pass [ ] Fail
4. Critical (panic) values identified and telephoned per Reporting Critical Values Policy[ ] Pass [ ] NA

1.3 Post-Analytical Verification

Verification ItemStatus (Pass / Fail)Remarks
1. Standard reference intervals and measurement units correctly stated[ ] Pass [ ] Fail
2. Verified by performing Medical Technologist; countersigned by Pathologist[ ] Pass [ ] Fail
3. Transcription into Excel-integrated LIS verified with zero typographical errors[ ] Pass [ ] Fail

---

Part 2 — Clinical Laboratory Report Format Compliance Audit

Conducted semi-annually on a random sample of issued reports across all clinical sections.

Element #Mandatory Report ElementStandard BasisCompliant (Yes / No)Deficiency Notes
1Full patient demographic identifiers (Name, MRN, Age, Sex)ISO 7.4.1.6; AO 2021-0037[ ] Yes [ ] No
2Attending physician name and clinical location (Ward/ER/OPD)ISO 7.4.1.6; DOH QMS Tool[ ] Yes [ ] No
3Specimen primary type and anatomical collection siteISO 7.4.1.6[ ] Yes [ ] No
4Date and time of specimen collection and receipt in laboratoryISO 7.4.1.6; AO 2021-0037[ ] Yes [ ] No
5Test name and standardized analytical methodologyISO 7.4.1.6[ ] Yes [ ] No
6Numerical result with standard conventional reporting unitsISO 7.4.1.6[ ] Yes [ ] No
7Age- and sex-specific biological reference intervals displayedISO 7.4.1.6; AO 2021-0037[ ] Yes [ ] No
8High, low, and critical result flags visually distinctISO 7.4.1.6[ ] Yes [ ] No
9Date and time of result verification and official releaseISO 7.4.1.6; AO 2021-0037[ ] Yes [ ] No
10Performing Medical Technologist printed name, PRC #, and wet signatureAO 2021-0037 Annex A V.B.5[ ] Yes [ ] No
11Pathologist printed name, PRC license #, and wet signatureAO 2021-0037 Annex B1 Item 26[ ] Yes [ ] No
12Hospital official header, laboratory address, and DOH license numberAO 2021-0037; ISO 7.4.1.6[ ] Yes [ ] No
13Patient confidentiality notice printed per RA 10173LAB-QM-005; RA 10173[ ] Yes [ ] No
14SPH referral results retained on referral lab's official formAO 2021-0037 Annex C Item A.7[ ] Yes [ ] No
15Interpretive comments provided for abnormal microscopic morphologyISO 7.4.1.6[ ] Yes [ ] No

---

Part 3 — Amended / Corrected Report Documentation & Notification Record

Mandatory whenever an already-released laboratory report is modified or amended due to an identified error.

3.1 Patient and Case Identification

3.2 Result Correction Data

Examination / AnalyteOriginal (Erroneous) ValueCorrected (New) ValueReference IntervalUnits

3.3 Root-Cause Categorization

3.4 Clinician Notification & Mandatory Verbatim Comment

---

Part 4 — Review and Pathologist Endorsement

4.1 Reporting Medical Technologist

4.2 Chief Medical Technologist / Laboratory Quality Manager

4.3 Pathologist / Head of Laboratory