TCH seal
TCH Laboratory — QMS Dashboard
Tarangnan Community Hospital · Quality Management System integrated with LUIB (read-only)
4
Notices
At a glance: 0 of 100 controlled documents approved (all V0 drafts) · 5 of 11 register indicators computable from this snapshot · visual library: 18 bench cards, 27 infographics, 29 flowcharts.
Snapshot freshness: Snapshot is 0 days old — within the weekly refresh cycle. (File: luib_snapshot.db, dated 2026-10-24 08:42)
Data source: this dashboard reads a snapshot — a copy of a LUIB backup file (see Snapshot freshness above), refreshed weekly. It is NOT the live clinical database and nothing here writes to LUIB. QMS document data is real: parsed from the actual MASTER-DOCUMENT-INDEX and the bundled document copies. All figures are computed live from the snapshot by this page.
Opened from LUIB? This dashboard runs in its own browser tab/window. To return to LUIB, close this tab or switch back to the LUIB window — nothing here writes to LUIB, and closing this page does not affect it.
Home / Documents / F-QM-004-A-V0

F-QM-004-A-V0 — Client Feedback, Satisfaction Survey, and Complaint Log

Type: Form · Version: V0 · Status: DRAFT — UNAPPROVED · Served read-only from the bundled QMS copies. The Drive master is untouched.

Parent document: LAB-QM-004 — Scope of Service and Laboratory User Information Policy (parent is encoded in the form number)

Rendered in-browser from the project's Word file F-QM-004-A-V0-client-feedback-survey-and-complaint-log.docx (policies-docx / forms-docx — the file Junry reviews). Formatting is faithful, not pixel-perfect; the DOCX is the official copy.

Document #F-QM-004-A-V0Parent DocumentLAB-QM-004 — Scope of Service and Laboratory User Information Policy

---

# SECTION A — CLIENT FEEDBACK & COMPLAINT RECORD

Part 1 — Complainant / Client Information

FieldEntry
Control / Tracking No.CL-YYYY-____
Date & Time ReceivedYYYY-MM-DD / HH:MM
Client / Complainant Name (Optional)
Contact Information (Phone / Address)
Client Category[ ] Patient / Relative [ ] Attending Physician [ ] Nurse / Ward Staff [ ] Other: ____________
Channel of Submission[ ] Suggestion Box [ ] Reception Desk [ ] Verbal [ ] Written Letter [ ] Phone Call
Received by (Staff Name & Designation)

Part 2 — Details of Concern & Immediate Containment

ItemDescription
Nature of Feedback[ ] Turnaround Time Delay [ ] Staff Attitude / Courtesy [ ] Phlebotomy / Specimen Collection [ ] Result Reporting / Clerical [ ] Facility / Cleanliness [ ] Other
Specific Description of the ConcernState facts clearly, including date, shift, personnel, and clinical impact.
Immediate Action TakenImmediate corrective steps taken at reception or bench to assist the client.
Date Complainant Acknowledged (Target <= 2 days)YYYY-MM-DD
Acknowledged ByName and Designation: ____________________________________

Part 3 — Investigation and Root-Cause Evaluation

FieldEvaluation Details
Investigating OfficerDesignated Complaints Officer / CMT: ________________________________
Investigation Findings
Quality Nonconformance Identified?[ ] Yes (Trigger Occurrence Report F-QM-010-A-V0) [ ] No
Occurrence Report No. (if applicable)
Root Cause / Contributing Factors

Part 4 — Resolution, Corrective Action, and Formal Closure

FieldResolution Details
Corrective / Preventive Action Plan
Resolution Communicated to Client (Target <= 7 days)YYYY-MM-DD
Method of Communication[ ] Verbal / In-person [ ] Phone Call [ ] Written Letter / Memorandum
Resolution Accepted by Client?[ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Unable to contact
Target Resolution Extension Approved By (if > 7 days)Pathologist / CMT: ___________________ Reason: _______________________
Investigating Officer Signature & DateSignature: _________________________________ Date: _________________
Chief Medical Technologist / LQM Review & ClosureSignature: _________________________________ Date: _________________

---

# SECTION B — COMPLAINT MASTER REGISTER & TRACKING LOG

Running log of all complaints, user concerns, and grievances received by the Clinical Laboratory:

Log No.Date Rec'dComplainant Name & CategoryChannelNature of ComplaintReceived ByAck Date (<= 2d)Action / Resolution SummaryTarget DateResolved Date (<= 7d)Occurrence Ref (if any)Closed By (Initials & Date)
C-2026-01
C-2026-02
C-2026-03
C-2026-04
C-2026-05

---

# SECTION C — CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY INSTRUMENT

Part 1 — General Survey Information

FieldEntry
Date of ServiceYYYY-MM-DD
Client Category[ ] Outpatient [ ] Inpatient / Relative [ ] Physician [ ] Nurse / Ward Staff
Section / Service Used[ ] Reception / Phlebotomy [ ] Hematology [ ] Clinical Microscopy [ ] Clinical Chemistry [ ] Serology

Part 2 — Service Evaluation Matrix

Rating Scale: 5 - Excellent | 4 - Very Satisfied | 3 - Satisfied | 2 - Dissatisfied | 1 - Poor

Dimension / IndicatorRating (1 - 5)Comments / Observations
1. Reception & Courtesy: Staff polite, helpful, and accommodating[ ] 5 [ ] 4 [ ] 3 [ ] 2 [ ] 1
2. Waiting Time: Waiting time for reception and blood draw reasonable[ ] 5 [ ] 4 [ ] 3 [ ] 2 [ ] 1
3. Phlebotomy Experience: Blood extraction gentle, professional, and hygienic[ ] 5 [ ] 4 [ ] 3 [ ] 2 [ ] 1
4. Turnaround Time: Test results delivered within promised time frame[ ] 5 [ ] 4 [ ] 3 [ ] 2 [ ] 1
5. Facility & Cleanliness: Specimen collection area clean, safe, and organized[ ] 5 [ ] 4 [ ] 3 [ ] 2 [ ] 1
6. Overall Satisfaction: Overall satisfaction with diagnostic services[ ] 5 [ ] 4 [ ] 3 [ ] 2 [ ] 1

Part 3 — Suggestions and Feedback

(Please share comments, commendations, or suggestions for improvement): ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ (Optional) Client Name / Contact: ________________________________________________________________

---

# SECTION D — QUARTERLY SATISFACTION ANALYSIS & CQI REVIEW

The Complaints Officer and CMT compile this quarterly for review in the CQI Committee and Management Review:

Review QuarterTotal Surveys CollectedAverage Satisfaction Score (1–5)Overall Satisfaction Rate (%)Target Met (>= 90%)Key Areas for Improvement IdentifiedCQI Action Plan InitiatedReviewed By (CMT & Pathologist)
Q1 2026[ ] Yes [ ] No
Q2 2026[ ] Yes [ ] No
Q3 2026[ ] Yes [ ] No
Q4 2026[ ] Yes [ ] No